Laloo justifies giving wrong information about his sons ages

  RJD Chief Laloo Prasad Yadav and his two sons have stirred a fresh controversy today. Laloo’s elder son Tej Prathap Yadav and his younger son Tejaswi Yadav both are contesting in the Bihar Assembly elections that commences from October 12th.   While the elder one is contesting from Mahua Assembly constituency in Vaishali district, the younger one is contesting from Raghopur Assembly constituency. They both submitted their nomination papers along with elections affidavits in which the elder one Tej Prathap mentioned his age as 25 years and the younger one as 26 years. It means the younger brother is bigger than elder brother as per their affidavits submitted to elections officers.   If, someone else is there in their place, certainly they may try to rectify the mistake before it is too late. But, Laloo Prasad Yadav and his two sons strongly defend themselves and arguing that they did not commit any mistakes. They argue that they exactly mentioned the same age that was mentioned in their voters cards. Laloo Prasad Yadav says he can’t help it. Tej Prathap Singh said he can’t give wrong information in the elections affidavit. So, mentioned the same that was in his voter card.   Being served as Chief Minister of the state, Laloo Prasad Yadav might know what happens if intentionally submit wrong information in the elections affidavit. The elections officer may reject their nominations and also can recommend the EC for further legal proceedings against them. But, Laloo and his two sons stick to their arguments. Let us hope election commission will take appropriate action against them.

Jagan sings same song again

  YSR Congress party president Jagan Mohan Reddy never tried to hide his desperate ambition to become Chief Minister of the state. He expresses it at every given occasion. Today also he revealed his strong ambition to rule the state. He visited Bhogapuram village where farmers are opposing the statement government’s proposal to construct airport on their farm lands. They plainly told the revenue officials that they do not want to handover their lands to government for airport construction. Hence, Jagan Mohan Reddy landed there to fight on behalf of them.   He educated the farmers about various airports in the country and their specifications and questioned the statement government wants to collect 12, 000 acres of land for constructing airport at Bhogapuram? He asked why the statement government wants to construct a new airport when the Airports Authority is ready to upgrade the existing airport at Visakhapatnam.   He said around 1000 acres of vacant lands that belong to government and Indian Navy is available beside the Visakhapatnam airport, which is sufficient for upgrading it. But Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu is proposing this project at Bhogapuram merely to provide some benefit to ministers Ayyannapatrudu, Ganta Srinivasa Rao and MP Avanthi Srinivas. Jagan alleges that Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu makes sure their lands are spared from the land acquisition.   Finally, he concludes his speech stating that his party is coming into power after three years and assured to return their lands. Actually, he lands there to fight on behalf of them with the statement government. But he is suggesting them to give up their fight and handover their lands to government because he is going to return their lands when he becomes Chief Minister of the state. Is this what the farmers are expecting from him?

Revanth Reddy straight question to Chief Minister KCR

  Telangana TDP working president Revanth Reddy shoots a straight question to Chief Minister KCR. He asked whether Chief Minister KCR and his nephew T Harish Rao both want to run the Assembly as they wish as if it’s their play ground.   He asked Chief Minister KCR “Several times you proudly said that Telangana is a second richest state in the country. Then why are you not clearing crop loans even after 14 months in the power? Your government wouldn’t hesitate to call tenders worth Rs.40, 000 crore to provide works for Andhra contractors. But, you have no money to clear the crop loans to save our farmers? You have cheated the people of the state, especially our farmers. We will visit each and every village in the state to educate the farmers about your government’s double standards on this particular issue. We will not let you and your ministers step into villages if won’t clear the crop loans immediately,” warns Revanth Reddy.   Revanth Reddy’s demand for one time settlement of crop-loans can be justified in wake of Chief Minister KCR’s proud claims about Telangana being second richest state in the country. He often repeats this statement whenever his government increases the wages of its employees. Moreover, Telangana government proudly announces just yesterday that India Credit Rating Agency gave Telangana state ‘A’ grade for its sound financial condition. So, the opposition parties’ demand for one-time clearance of crop loans is quite justified. Chief Minister KCR should come out with a straight answer for opposition parties’ questions about why he is hesitating to clear the crop loans at a time.

Astrologers raise objections on Muhurtham-12.45 pm

  AP government decided to lay foundation stone for its capital city Amaravati on October 22nd at 12.45 PM on the eve of Vijayadashami festival. Generally, people of the state believe that any work or project started on Vijayadashami day would become a grand success. So, many shops, new projects will be launched on that particular day all over the state. But, the timing of muhurtham-12.45 pm is drawing criticism from Astrologers and Vasthu specialists as well.   Generally, such programs should be completed before 12.00 noon and not after. Tallavajula Sriramakrishna Sarma of Tadepalligudem in West Godavari district, secretary of the Vasthu Vignana Parishad said “The government chooses Makara Lagna at 12.45 pm, which is danger to its stability. Instead, if it performs the same at Dhanur Lagna at 11.39 AM, it ensures stability and speedy growth for the state. The government should have fixed the muhurtham after consulting the Vasthu experts and Astrologers instead of taking opinion from an individual Astrologer.”   “There is no meaning in fixing muhurtham to suit Prime Minister’s schedule. Statement government should fix muhurtham that suits best for the state and not to suit Prime Minister’s schedule. One can’t fix a half a dozen muhurthams for one ceremony to suit anyone’s schedule. Whether he is Prime Minister or President of India, he should plan accordingly to attend the ceremony at the scheduled muhurtham and muhurtham should not be fixed to match his schedule. If fixed, then there is no necessary for fixing muhurtham at all. The ceremony can be performed whenever PM comes,” said another astrologer in the district.

Venkaiah Naidu speaks on special status again

  Union Minister Venkaiah Naidu switched off his statements on special status since last few months after it back fires at him when Centre takes ‘U’ turn on it. He was severely criticized for it by the opposition parties in the state. But, he once again speaks about it during his visit to Nellore yesterday.   He said “Special status matter is under consideration of Neeti Ayog. However, we should understand that special status alone will not be answer for all our problems. Our government is ready to help the state to develop much better than it could develop with special status. India alone withstands the shocks of global financial crunches and making a steady progress because our economical and financial policies are very strong. So, we have to do team work from Panchayat level to Centre to maintain that pace in development of our country.”   The timing of his statement on special status is very much helpful to opposition parties, which are desperately trying to woo the people of the state, who appear to be gradually losing interest in it. Especially, the timing may proved very deadly when Jagan Mohan Reddy who is troubling to gather public support for his hunger strike for special status to be started from October 7th at Guntur. Venkaiah Naidu’s statement about special status under Neeti Ayog consideration and the views he express on it may provide enough ammo for YSR Congress party to provoke the people of the state.

Nirbhaya juvenile interacts with Jihadi Juvenile

  Intelligence sleuths alerted the Juvenile Justice Board and the Union Home Ministry about interaction between two juveniles kept at Juvenile special home at Magazine Road near Majnu Ka Tila in North Delhi. One is detained in Nirbhaya case and the other is in Delhi High Court bomb blasts case.   Intelligence sleuths observed that the juvenile facing punishment in bomb blasts case is trying to draw the other into Jihadi fold during their interaction. They both turned 20 now and the one who was serving his 3 years term in Nirbhaya case will be released from juvenile home in December this year. Hence, the intelligence sleuths suspects that he may turn into a trouble maker for the country if allowed to remain under influence of other juvenile in the home. Following the instructions from higher officials, the care -takers of the juvenile home shifted them to different rooms in the same house.   But, this development is underlining a point that the juvenile home care-takers failed to bring any change in the juveniles’ criminal attitudes for which they were kept in their observation. Juvenile Board spends crores of rupees for providing education, medical, counseling and rehabilitation for juveniles to make sure they join the main stream after their release from the home.   But, after serving 34 months in the juvenile home, the juvenile convicted in heinous Nirbhaya crime was found got attracted to Jihadi movement instead of turning into a decent citizen. This is indeed a failure and negligence of the care-takers of the juvenile home. They even failed to notice their interaction and their idea behind it. The juvenile takers to be blamed in case if the juvenile releasing from home in December this year if creates any big problems for the country.

India gives fitting reply to Pakistan

  Unlike earlier times, India is strongly reacting to Pakistan’s allegations after Narendra Modi takes charge of the government as Prime Minister. There is visible change in India’s attitude towards Pakistan. India that has been adopted defensive policy during all these decades now switches to offensive mode. It can be seen in the fitting reply given to Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s suggestions for resolving Kashmir issue during his speech at United Nations.   He proposed four suggestions to India to resolve this burning issue. 1. De-militarizing Kashmir. 2. De-militarizing Siyachin. 3. Strictly implementing seize-fire agreement. 4. Avoid threatening each other.   India sharply reacts to his proposals. Vikas Swarup, the official spokesperson of Ministry of External Affairs tweets,   “To de-militarize Kashmir is not the answer, to de-terrorize Pakistan is.” “Pakistan's instability arises from its breeding of terrorists. Blaming neighbors is not a solution.” “Pakistan is not primary victim of terrorism but of its own policies. It is in fact the prime sponsor of terrorism.” “Sharif UNGA speech: Pak PM gets foreign occupation right, occupier wrong. We urge early vacation of Pak occupied Kashmir.” “Pakistan is not primary victim of terrorism but of its own policies. It is in fact the prime sponsor of terrorism.” “Sharif UNGA speech: Pak PM gets foreign occupation right, occupier wrong. We urge early vacation of Pak occupied Kashmir.”   MEA spokesperson doesn’t maintain any hypocrisy in expressing India’s views on Pakistan PM Nawaz Sharif’s proposals. Never like before, India is stating that it is Pakistan that occupies part of Kashmir state and demanding it to vacate it immediately. India is also now plainly saying that Pakistan is sponsoring the terrorism and it is the root cause for its backwardness and unrest in Pakistan.