Income Tax Department Led to Jagan Doom

It was income tax department that was cue behind the nailing of Jagan Mohan Reddy, says CBI. Though Jagan has been arrested yesterday by the CBI, but it was income tax department that first smelt a rat in Jagan dealings way back in 2010. The I-T department nailed Jagan for the first time at the end of 2010 in its tax assessment order. And this order seems to have been the starting point of CBI's investigations.

Examining the returns filed by Jagati Publications that publishes Sakshi newspaper, the tax department realised that something was not squaring up. Precisely what caught the attention of the tax officials was that 90% of the equity in the company was held by Jagan and his close associates but they had only contributed 20% of the share capital. On the other hand, a few outside shareholders held 10% of the equity although they had contributed 80% of the share capital. This anomaly happened, as per the tax men, because Jagan had been allotted shares at the par value whereas the outside shareholders had been allotted equity at a premium of Rs 350 per share.

Taxmen studied the newspaper business in Andhra Pradesh and realized that there was cut throat competition in the market. Most of the newspapers were in losses and relied greatly on advertisements that were chary in coming. This led to the conclusion that the investors had not put their money in the hope that Jagati would perform excellently in the market. This was in line with books of accounts of Sakshi that showed that by March end 2010, Jagati had totted up losses of Rs 319.84 crore. Many of the investors were big companies whose track records showed that they had great business acumen. So they would not be foolish enough to invest in a difficult business and in a company that was in losses.

So what led these companies to invest in Jagati? Taxmen issued notices to these companies which had picked up equity in Jagati and realized (from their replies) that all of them had been allotted huge tracts of land and projects in Special Economic Zones (SEZs) by the Y S Rajasekhara Reddy government. The taxmen came to the conclusion that it was in lieu of these projects that these companies had invested in Jagati Publications. In the end the taxmen came to the conclusion and this was noted in the tax assessment report: “the amount paid to Jagati (the assesee company) cannot be justified as share premium but as income to Jagati.” And therefore a demand of Rs 122 crore was slapped on Jagati Publications.
 

Modi Is Not Our PM: Owaisi

MIM is a recognized state political party based in the Indian state of Telangana, with its head office in the old city of Hyderabad, which has its roots in the Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen founded in 1927. Unlike most of the regional and national level parties, MIM party leaders ‘fight’ only for the well-being of Muslims, whereas no other party has such communal feelings. In their each and every speech, MIM leaders speak only about Muslims. If these leaders are here to fight for Muslims, then why there are no development works are happening in old city area for decades. Akbaruddin Owaisi faced criticism for making hate remarks on Narendra Modi and Hindus. Recently, his elder brother Asaduddin Owaisi made some notorious annotations. In a one-on-one debate between BJP spokesperson Sambit Patra and Asaduddin Owaisi on the topic of demonetization in a popular Hindi channel, the former left no stone unturned in exposing the latter’s communal designs. Owaisi claimed how most of the Muslim community still remains unbanked and that demonetization has caused severe inconvenience to Muslims. He even went on to say that ATM’s in Muslim-dominated areas weren’t fed enough money. He indirectly alleged that the Modi government hadn’t done anything for Muslims. Even after being pressurized Owaisi didn’t call Narendra Modi as his Prime Minister. He went on said, “Your Prime Minister…” On the other hand, Sambit spoke wisely and called Owaisi a leader of small stature because he talked only of Muslims. He said that no area was Muslim or Hindu and that all areas belonged to India. Owaisi was constantly quoting an RBI report, to which Sambit challenged him to show where the RBI had used the word ‘Muslim’. Sambit even said that if a Muslim leader speaks of Muslims it’s not an issue, but the moment a VHP leader speaks of Hindus people go crazy accusing them of imposing the Hindutva ideology. The most amazing of his counters was to Owaisi’s claims of Muslims not having been brought into the banking system. Sambit said that when banks or ATMs are to be opened in Muslim areas leaders like Owaisi shout that banking is un-Islamic and that Muslims should refrain from it! This video of debate between Sambit Patra and Asaduddin Owaisi is going viral in social media.