Goud Re-entry to TDP Costs it 4 MLAs

Four senior leaders of Telugu Desam Party, who were already suspended for anti-party activities submitted their resignations from the primary membership of the party on Wednesday. The four MLAs are Nagam Janardana Reddy, K Harishswar Reddy, S Venugopalachary and Jogu Ramanna.

The four MLAs had earlier submitted their resignations from the Assembly along with the legislators from the other political parties in the Telangana region in order to mount pressure on the separate state issue. Superficially it appears that these MLAs have tendered their resignations for the cause of separate Telangana. But, the real cause is something entirely different say the informed sources. The reasoning seems to be true when we dwell in to the past of these leaders.

To begin with, Nagam Janardhan Reddy has started his political career with the TDP and became minister twice in Naidu's cabinet. He was elected from Nagarkurnool in Mahbubnagar district in 2009 and was made deputy leader of the legislature party in the Assembly. He was also made chairman of Public Accounts Committee by Naidu. However, after the 're-entry of T Devender Goud', another Telangana leader, into the party fold, he was sidelined by the party chief.

Among those who quit the Telugu Desam party, Venugopalachary was considered a close confidant of Naidu. He had also served as Union minister in the United Front government. He was a trusted colleague of Naidu and stood by him during the 1995 split in the TDP. In the 2009 elections, he was elected from Mudhole constituency and he too was sidelined by Naidu after Goud's re-entry. Since then, Venugopalachary has been playing an active role in Telangana politics. He said that he had decided to quit the party as it has failed to take a clear stand on the Telangana issue.

R Harishwar Reddy held the deputy speaker post when the TDP was in power. He also felt sidelined in the party after the return of Devender Goud which widened the gap between Naidu and himself. Known as pro-farmer leader, Harishwar wields a lot of clout in his Parigi constituency and in Ranga Reddy district, which happens to be adjacent to Devender Goud's constituency. Ofcourse, Jogu Ramanna is said to be close to Nagam and naturally, he followed suit Nagam.

What observers say is, Devender Goud is the common factor of dissent for all the four leaders. Nagam was heading the Telangana Forum prior to E Dayakar Rao. He didn't convince Naidu to take a favourable stance towards Telangana, instead tried to corner Chandrababu by pressurising him to give party's consent in writing to Pranab Mukherji in Telanagana's favour. Love for Telangana isn't the real reason for leaving TDP, but the actual 'bone of contention' was being sidelined on Goud's re-entry into the party.
 

Modi Is Not Our PM: Owaisi

MIM is a recognized state political party based in the Indian state of Telangana, with its head office in the old city of Hyderabad, which has its roots in the Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen founded in 1927. Unlike most of the regional and national level parties, MIM party leaders ‘fight’ only for the well-being of Muslims, whereas no other party has such communal feelings. In their each and every speech, MIM leaders speak only about Muslims. If these leaders are here to fight for Muslims, then why there are no development works are happening in old city area for decades. Akbaruddin Owaisi faced criticism for making hate remarks on Narendra Modi and Hindus. Recently, his elder brother Asaduddin Owaisi made some notorious annotations. In a one-on-one debate between BJP spokesperson Sambit Patra and Asaduddin Owaisi on the topic of demonetization in a popular Hindi channel, the former left no stone unturned in exposing the latter’s communal designs. Owaisi claimed how most of the Muslim community still remains unbanked and that demonetization has caused severe inconvenience to Muslims. He even went on to say that ATM’s in Muslim-dominated areas weren’t fed enough money. He indirectly alleged that the Modi government hadn’t done anything for Muslims. Even after being pressurized Owaisi didn’t call Narendra Modi as his Prime Minister. He went on said, “Your Prime Minister…” On the other hand, Sambit spoke wisely and called Owaisi a leader of small stature because he talked only of Muslims. He said that no area was Muslim or Hindu and that all areas belonged to India. Owaisi was constantly quoting an RBI report, to which Sambit challenged him to show where the RBI had used the word ‘Muslim’. Sambit even said that if a Muslim leader speaks of Muslims it’s not an issue, but the moment a VHP leader speaks of Hindus people go crazy accusing them of imposing the Hindutva ideology. The most amazing of his counters was to Owaisi’s claims of Muslims not having been brought into the banking system. Sambit said that when banks or ATMs are to be opened in Muslim areas leaders like Owaisi shout that banking is un-Islamic and that Muslims should refrain from it! This video of debate between Sambit Patra and Asaduddin Owaisi is going viral in social media.