CBI Cites Naidu Example in Jagan 3 Chargesheet

According to the third chargesheet in the Jagan Mohan Reddy’s illegal investment case, the project structure of the Pharma City was changed from Build, Own, Operate and Transfer (BOOT) to just Build, Operate and Own (BOO). Significantly, the CBI has built its case in the Vanpic issue on a similar change from BOOT to BOO and stated that it was the base for the quid pro quo investments by promoter Nimmagadda Prasad.

 

Investigations revealed that a Cabinet sub-committee appointed by the then CM N. Chandrababu Naidu had made the changes in the project structure in the Ramky affair, that too halfway through the tendering process. The tender was notified on December, 17, 2002, and 11 companies, including Ramky, had submitted Expressions of Interest. Later, seven companies, including Ramky, had purchased Request for Proposal documents but only three, Zoom Developers, Maridi and Vartsila, submitted detailed proposals.



The bids of Maridi and Vartsila were found incomplete and subsequently Zoom also became ineligible as it failed to furnish replies sought by the APIIC. It was at this stage that Mr Naidu constituted the sub-committee which approved the changes on June 28, 2003. Interestingly, Ramky submitted its proposal on July 31, 2003, and Mr Naidu approved the note, giving in-principle go ahead to the developer. The very day he recommended dissolution of the Assembly on Nov. 14, 2003. CBI investigations also revealed that Ramky Pharma City India Ltd was set up on March 11, 2004, just one day before the APIIC entered into a concession agreement with it.

Modi Is Not Our PM: Owaisi

MIM is a recognized state political party based in the Indian state of Telangana, with its head office in the old city of Hyderabad, which has its roots in the Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen founded in 1927. Unlike most of the regional and national level parties, MIM party leaders ‘fight’ only for the well-being of Muslims, whereas no other party has such communal feelings. In their each and every speech, MIM leaders speak only about Muslims. If these leaders are here to fight for Muslims, then why there are no development works are happening in old city area for decades. Akbaruddin Owaisi faced criticism for making hate remarks on Narendra Modi and Hindus. Recently, his elder brother Asaduddin Owaisi made some notorious annotations. In a one-on-one debate between BJP spokesperson Sambit Patra and Asaduddin Owaisi on the topic of demonetization in a popular Hindi channel, the former left no stone unturned in exposing the latter’s communal designs. Owaisi claimed how most of the Muslim community still remains unbanked and that demonetization has caused severe inconvenience to Muslims. He even went on to say that ATM’s in Muslim-dominated areas weren’t fed enough money. He indirectly alleged that the Modi government hadn’t done anything for Muslims. Even after being pressurized Owaisi didn’t call Narendra Modi as his Prime Minister. He went on said, “Your Prime Minister…” On the other hand, Sambit spoke wisely and called Owaisi a leader of small stature because he talked only of Muslims. He said that no area was Muslim or Hindu and that all areas belonged to India. Owaisi was constantly quoting an RBI report, to which Sambit challenged him to show where the RBI had used the word ‘Muslim’. Sambit even said that if a Muslim leader speaks of Muslims it’s not an issue, but the moment a VHP leader speaks of Hindus people go crazy accusing them of imposing the Hindutva ideology. The most amazing of his counters was to Owaisi’s claims of Muslims not having been brought into the banking system. Sambit said that when banks or ATMs are to be opened in Muslim areas leaders like Owaisi shout that banking is un-Islamic and that Muslims should refrain from it! This video of debate between Sambit Patra and Asaduddin Owaisi is going viral in social media.