Chandrababu Vacate Petition Hopping From One Bench to Another

In an unprecedented manner, the case related to CBI's preliminary enquiry (PE) into Telugu Desam Party president N. Chandrababu Naidu's alleged disproportionate assets is getting transferred from one bench of the High Court to another. On Friday, a division bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court transferred the case from itself to another bench after the advocate representing YSR Congress honorary president Y.S. Vijayalakshmi attributed political motives to one of the judges.

Chandrababu Naidu's petition was originally meant to be heard by the Justice Lokur bench and it came up for hearing on Thursday. However, the chief justice recused himself from the case on the ground that he had owned several shares in Reliance Industry Limited, owned by Mukesh Ambani. The CJ pointed out that RIL had impleaded in Naidu's case as Vijayalakshmi accused the company of being a major beneficiary during Naidu's regime. According to her, RIL had invested in the Eenadu Group owned by Ramoji Rao.

On Saturday the division bench comprising Justice V. Eshwaraiah and Justice K.S. Appa Rao, was to hear the petitions filed by Naidu and others in the morning. They were seeking the vacation of the HC's earlier directive, ordering the PE into the assets the TDP chief acquired during his regime as chief minister between 1995 and 2004. However, Vijayalakshmi's counsel Sushil Kumar refused to argue the case. He said he had serious doubts about the credibility of Justice Eshwaraiah's judgments, as his family had connections with the TDP. He alleged that Naidu's manoeuvring had ensured that his petitions were referred to the bench that included Justice Eshwaraiah. He pointed out that the judge had, in the past, delivered several judgments in favour of the TDP.

In spite of the judges trying to convince, Counsel Susheel Kumar didn't relent and the judges announced that the case would be referred to another bench in on the discretion of chief justice M.B. Lokur and posted the hearing for Monday. While some senior political observers point out that it was not proper to attribute political motives to the judges, some expressed doubt whether Babu "cleverly" got the petitions transferred, as alleged by the YSR Congress Party.

 

 

 

Modi Is Not Our PM: Owaisi

MIM is a recognized state political party based in the Indian state of Telangana, with its head office in the old city of Hyderabad, which has its roots in the Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen founded in 1927. Unlike most of the regional and national level parties, MIM party leaders ‘fight’ only for the well-being of Muslims, whereas no other party has such communal feelings. In their each and every speech, MIM leaders speak only about Muslims. If these leaders are here to fight for Muslims, then why there are no development works are happening in old city area for decades. Akbaruddin Owaisi faced criticism for making hate remarks on Narendra Modi and Hindus. Recently, his elder brother Asaduddin Owaisi made some notorious annotations. In a one-on-one debate between BJP spokesperson Sambit Patra and Asaduddin Owaisi on the topic of demonetization in a popular Hindi channel, the former left no stone unturned in exposing the latter’s communal designs. Owaisi claimed how most of the Muslim community still remains unbanked and that demonetization has caused severe inconvenience to Muslims. He even went on to say that ATM’s in Muslim-dominated areas weren’t fed enough money. He indirectly alleged that the Modi government hadn’t done anything for Muslims. Even after being pressurized Owaisi didn’t call Narendra Modi as his Prime Minister. He went on said, “Your Prime Minister…” On the other hand, Sambit spoke wisely and called Owaisi a leader of small stature because he talked only of Muslims. He said that no area was Muslim or Hindu and that all areas belonged to India. Owaisi was constantly quoting an RBI report, to which Sambit challenged him to show where the RBI had used the word ‘Muslim’. Sambit even said that if a Muslim leader speaks of Muslims it’s not an issue, but the moment a VHP leader speaks of Hindus people go crazy accusing them of imposing the Hindutva ideology. The most amazing of his counters was to Owaisi’s claims of Muslims not having been brought into the banking system. Sambit said that when banks or ATMs are to be opened in Muslim areas leaders like Owaisi shout that banking is un-Islamic and that Muslims should refrain from it! This video of debate between Sambit Patra and Asaduddin Owaisi is going viral in social media.