Debate on Black Money in Parliament: Highlights

After senior BJP leader LK Advani moved an adjournment motion on black money in the Lok Sabha today and accused the government of being soft on the issue, the Congress hit back at them by saying the problem of black money is a legacy issue. Here are the highlights of the debate.

 

Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee

 

  • Will not enter into a debate to win some brownie points
  • $ 213 Billion lost by India from 1948-2008 suggest reports
  • I want to have an authentic, authoritative assessment  of the quantum of black money
  • We have  to deal with other sovereign countries - there are laws, international practices which we have to follow.
  • Black money issue serious, must not politicise it
  • Tax havens are not located in developing nations like India. They are located in developing countries. They had doggedly refused double-taxation agreements.
  • They started negotiating only when G-20 countries, led by US, started putting pressure
  • Today we have agreements with 60 nations; remaining 15 are in the process of negotiation
  • Even with Switzerland the agreement for sharing information has been signed in September 2010; they said they would give us prospective information.
  • No country in the world got information from Switzerland with retrospective effect.
  • Adavni ji spoke of dirty money; we are fully aware of it and this Parliament has a legislation on it.
  • All evasion or avoidance cases are not criminal cases in this country. Neither your government did it, nor our government did it.
  • Income Tax department does not administer IPC. They collect taxes, check evasion
  • If I share the information I have, our sources of information will dry up
  • Disclosure of names would make offenders withdraw their money from foreign accounts, and we will not be able to trace the money.
  • There is an element of surprise - how money is seized, how investigations are done.
  • If there is an element of criminality, definitely the names can be disclosed.
  • I am disturbed that Mr Ad

 

LK Advani's address to Parliament:

 

  • Should we wait for Assange to reveal black money offenders?
  • Names of 782 Indian tax evaders being kept secret
  • Black money stashed abroad needs to be brought back
  • Supreme Court said Government is soft on black money
  • Black money used for funding terrorists
  • Issue of black money never taken up in House before
  • Adjournment motion is a failure of government
  • Government silent on the names of black money account holders
  • Rs. 25 lakh crore stashed in Swiss banks
  • Government has to explain why it wasn't proactive
  • Government should disclose names of those connected to Hasan Ali
  • Government must bring out white paper on black money
  • PM, Finance Minister must bring a law on black money

 

Shashi Tharoor's address to Parliament

 

  • Wrong to say UPA not serious
  • Can't name Swiss account holders
  • Have to abide by treaties

 

Congress' Manish Tewari's address to Parliament

 

 

 

 

 

Modi Is Not Our PM: Owaisi

MIM is a recognized state political party based in the Indian state of Telangana, with its head office in the old city of Hyderabad, which has its roots in the Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen founded in 1927. Unlike most of the regional and national level parties, MIM party leaders ‘fight’ only for the well-being of Muslims, whereas no other party has such communal feelings. In their each and every speech, MIM leaders speak only about Muslims. If these leaders are here to fight for Muslims, then why there are no development works are happening in old city area for decades. Akbaruddin Owaisi faced criticism for making hate remarks on Narendra Modi and Hindus. Recently, his elder brother Asaduddin Owaisi made some notorious annotations. In a one-on-one debate between BJP spokesperson Sambit Patra and Asaduddin Owaisi on the topic of demonetization in a popular Hindi channel, the former left no stone unturned in exposing the latter’s communal designs. Owaisi claimed how most of the Muslim community still remains unbanked and that demonetization has caused severe inconvenience to Muslims. He even went on to say that ATM’s in Muslim-dominated areas weren’t fed enough money. He indirectly alleged that the Modi government hadn’t done anything for Muslims. Even after being pressurized Owaisi didn’t call Narendra Modi as his Prime Minister. He went on said, “Your Prime Minister…” On the other hand, Sambit spoke wisely and called Owaisi a leader of small stature because he talked only of Muslims. He said that no area was Muslim or Hindu and that all areas belonged to India. Owaisi was constantly quoting an RBI report, to which Sambit challenged him to show where the RBI had used the word ‘Muslim’. Sambit even said that if a Muslim leader speaks of Muslims it’s not an issue, but the moment a VHP leader speaks of Hindus people go crazy accusing them of imposing the Hindutva ideology. The most amazing of his counters was to Owaisi’s claims of Muslims not having been brought into the banking system. Sambit said that when banks or ATMs are to be opened in Muslim areas leaders like Owaisi shout that banking is un-Islamic and that Muslims should refrain from it! This video of debate between Sambit Patra and Asaduddin Owaisi is going viral in social media.