Star hero Salman Khan was acquitted of all charges by the Court in Mumbai the other day. That makes Sallu walk free of the 2002 hit-and-run case. High Court found that there is no evidence regarding whether Salman is drunk or not, whether tyres bursted or not, or to believe key eye witness Ravindra Patil or not.

An example of what Court noticed and what Salman's lawyers pointed out: Salman might have drunk something at bar, not necessarily bar. Actually he drank a crystal clear liquid, which maybe water or rum or vodka. While witnesses suggested its white-rum, Court pointed out that police and prosecuting failed to get bar bill such that to find out what Salman has drunk. And we can understand what sort of verdict Court has given in favour of Salman.

Apparently people who are closely observing this case have become bakras. Don't they think that that trial court can't find all these 'minuted evidences' in their 13 year trial?